CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6750 XT
+2383%
13.31 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2150 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
40
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
216
160
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
166.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
416.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
26.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
832.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Navi 22
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 22 KXT (215-127000144)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
335 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
2
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 7600
3
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
4
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
5
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
7
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
8
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Intel Arc A580
9
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 OEM
10
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
2
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
3
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
4
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
5
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
6
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
7
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
8
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
9
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
10
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy