CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon RX 6800
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6800 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 6800 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2105MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6800
+2916%
16.17 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6800
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1700 MHz
Base Clock
-
2105 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
60
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
216
240
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
202.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
505.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
32.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
1010 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Navi 21
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 21 XL (215-121000187)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
2
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
3
AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
4
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
5
AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
6
AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
7
AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570 OEM
8
AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2
9
AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs ATI Radeon HD 5550
10
AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon 550
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy