Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6900 XT +1513%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Dec 2015
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
12
5120
Shading Units
768
320
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

288.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
720.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
46.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Bonaire
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy