Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XTX and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock2435MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
5040 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 330W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6900 XTX +31062%
24.93 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2010
Navi II
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2435 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
80
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

311.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
779.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
49.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1.558 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

330W
TDP
17W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Cedar
Navi 21 XTXH (215-121000247)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy