Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX vs AMD FirePro S9170

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XTX and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock2435MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (275W vs 330W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6900 XTX +375%
24.93 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2015
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2435 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
2816
320
TMUs
176
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

311.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
779.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
49.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
1.558 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

330W
TDP
275W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Hawaii
Navi 21 XTXH (215-121000247)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy