Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 335W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6950 XT +196%
23.65 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
64
5120
Shading Units
4096
320
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

335W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy