Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2245MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7900 GRE +3529%
45.98 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2023
Release Date
Aug 2012
Navi III
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1287 MHz
Base Clock
-
2245 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
768
320
TMUs
48
160
ROPs
32
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

359.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
718.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
91.96 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.98 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
1437 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 31 XL (215-145000206)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy