Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2245MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7900 GRE +5886%
45.98 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Navi III
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1287 MHz
Base Clock
-
2245 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
8
5120
Shading Units
512
320
TMUs
32
160
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

359.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
718.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
91.96 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.98 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
1437 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 31 XL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy