Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs AMD FirePro W9100

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XT +1131%
64.51 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2014
Navi III
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
3000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
512bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
5376
Shading Units
2816
336
TMUs
176
192
ROPs
64
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

576.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
1008 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
129.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
64.51 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
275W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Hawaii
Navi 31 XT+
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy