CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VS
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock3300MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 's Advantages
Lower TDP (210W vs 355W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XTX
+6081%
81.1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XTX
VS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2011
Navi III
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2200 MHz
Base Clock
-
3300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
152.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
448
384
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
Theoretical Performance
633.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.50 GPixel/s
1267 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.99 GTexel/s
162.2 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1312 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
164.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
GF110
Navi 31 XTX+
GPU Variant
GF110-270-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
355W
TDP
210W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
2
ATI FirePro V7800P vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
3
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
4
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
6
ATI Radeon HD 5850 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
7
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
8
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs AMD FirePro W9100
9
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X
10
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs ATI Radeon HD 5870
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy