Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 250

AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 8800 XT +2676%
19.91 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1295 MHz
Base Clock
-
2430 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2438 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
624.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
64
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

233.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
622.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
39.81 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.91 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 48
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 48 XT
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
RDNA 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy