AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

VS

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 56 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 's Advantages

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

3072 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1785MHz vs 1471MHz)

Lower TDP (75W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon RX Vega 56 +476%

10.54 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1630

1.828 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon RX Vega 56 +226%

6873

GeForce GTX 1630

2102

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon RX Vega 56 +400%

30

GeForce GTX 1630

6

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon RX Vega 56 +216%

57

GeForce GTX 1630

18

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon RX Vega 56 +190%

87

GeForce GTX 1630

30

Radeon RX Vega 56

VS

GeForce GTX 1630

Graphics Card

Aug 2017

Release Date

Jun 2022

Vega

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1156 MHz

Base Clock

1740 MHz

1471 MHz

Boost Clock

1785 MHz

800 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

4GB

HBM2

Memory Type

GDDR6

2048bit

Memory Bus

64bit

409.6GB/s

Bandwidth

96.00GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

8

56

Compute Units

-

3584

Shading Units

512

224

TMUs

32

64

ROPs

16

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

4 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

94.14 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

28.56 GPixel/s

329.5 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

57.12 GTexel/s

21.09 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

3.656 TFLOPS

10.54 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.828 TFLOPS

659.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

57.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 10

GPU Name

TU117

Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)

GPU Variant

TU117-150-KA-A1

GCN 5.0

Architecture

Turing

GlobalFoundries

Foundry

TSMC

14 nm

Process Size

12 nm

12.5 billion

Transistors

4.7 billion

495 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

210W

TDP

75W

550 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.1

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.4

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon RX 580

2

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

3

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

4

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

5

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

6

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

7

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP

8

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs ATI Radeon X1050

9

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition

10

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD