Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs ATI FirePro V8800

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega 64 +379%
12.66 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2017
Release Date
Apr 2010
Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
20
4096
Shading Units
1600
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
25.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Cypress
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
208W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy