Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs Intel Arc Pro A50

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (2350MHz vs 1546MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +163%
12.66 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2022
Vega
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
96bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
DG2-128
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy