Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1546MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +424%
12.66 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960
2.413 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2015
Vega
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
1127 MHz
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.70 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
75.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.413 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GM206
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
GM206-300-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy