Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +1688%
12.66 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2008
Vega
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
512bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
204W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy