Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1546MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +1470%
12.66 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2015
Vega
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Oland
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy