Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 409.6GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +76%
12.66 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY
7.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2015
Vega
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM
2048bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Fiji
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy