Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (1785MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 900 +86%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2022
Radeon Sky
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1740 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU117
Orthrus
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy