Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (115W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 900 +72%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Sky
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
115W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Bonaire
Orthrus
GPU Variant
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy