Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Sky
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
15W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
VSA-101
Orthrus
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy