Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2019
Radeon R300
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
203 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV360
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

24W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy