ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
Radeon R300
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
203 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
-
Shading Units
6144
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
24W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV360
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.8
