Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD FirePro S9150

ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon R400 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

24W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV410
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
R400
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.12 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy