Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 vs ATI FirePro V7900

ATI Radeon X1050 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon R400 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

24W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV410
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
R400
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.12 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy