Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2019
Radeon R400 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
200 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

24W
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV410
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
R400
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.12 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy