Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jul 2019
Radeon R400 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

24W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV410
GPU Name
Polaris 23
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
R400
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
110 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.12 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy