Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 106W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.73GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
-
Shading Units
144
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
106W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GF106
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy