Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1280GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.25 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
847.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
106.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GF110
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
GF110-040-A1
R500
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
3 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy