Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 60W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Feb 2014
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1020 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1389 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GM107
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
GM107-400-A2
R500
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy