Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2880
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GK180
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
R500
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy