Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 200W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2024
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1920 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
504.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
-
Shading Units
5888
4
TMUs
184
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
36 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
455.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.15 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
29.15 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
455.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
AD103
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
AD103-175-K1-A1
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy