Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
8448 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jun 2024
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
66
-
Shading Units
8448
4
TMUs
264
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
285W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
AD102
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy