Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.48GB/s vs 10.40GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 41W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
10.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

41W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
RV710
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
RV710 (215-0725016)
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy