Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4670 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 59W)
ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jul 2009
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

41W
TDP
59W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Floppy
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
RV730
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy