Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2020
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Navi 14
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
R500
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy