Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

ATI Radeon X1600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 134W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS

Board Design

27W
TDP
134W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
R500
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy