Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

ATI Radeon X1600 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

27W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy