Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 4850

ATI Radeon X1650 AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 4850

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4850 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4850 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
-
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
RV770
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO (215-0669065)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
110W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy