Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
May 2021
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
TU117
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy