Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Oct 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
G94B
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy