Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs NVIDIA NVS 315

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GF119
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy