Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.54GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
40 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Feb 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
6.336GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
-
Shading Units
40
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.376 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
47.52 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
RV620
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy