Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Apr 2017
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Ellesmere
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
90 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy