Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
392 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Lexa
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
90 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy