Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.54GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
TMUs
2
4
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
VSA-101
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
6.0
2.1
OpenGL
1.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy