Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
70
-
Shading Units
4480
4
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
N/A
2.1
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
3.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy