Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI FirePro V4900

ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
480
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy