Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI FirePro V3800

ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
-
Shading Units
400
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy