Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 3
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy